DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION: 9 February 2023
Guidance note from the technical leads of the Grand Bargain Transparency Workstream
Summary
IATI data can be used to track Grand Bargain multi-year funding commitments, with some caveats. This technical note outlines a methodology which can be followed by both Grand Bargain signatories and those tasked with monitoring the implementation of these commitments.
What do you think?
This is an draft note for consultation. We welcome feedback and discussion on this note, which can be discussed in detail on IATI Connect.Aid organisations and donors committed to:
Increase multi-year, collaborative and flexible planning and multi-year funding instruments and document the impacts on programme efficiency and effectiveness, ensuring that recipients apply the same funding arrangements with their implementing partners.
Support in at least five countries by the end of 2017 multi-year collaborative planning and response plans through multi-year funding and monitor and evaluate the outcomes of these responses.
Multi-year funding is defined in the following way:
‘Multi-year funding should have the following characteristics to enable recipient organisations to respond efficiently and effectively, especially to protracted crises, including to shifting dynamics on the ground:
- Duration: 24 months or more at the contract signature, in line with the OECDDAC definition
- Timeliness: approved funding is advanced to implementing agencies at the beginning of the agreed period, rather than being paid after the period in question
- Predictability: total funding approved for a multi-year programme should be paid up front wherever possible. Where this is not possible, pre-approved annual tranches should be disbursed, in line with existing guidelines, and as long as contractual obligations are met and funding is available
- Flexible arrangements: funding should have some of these features –
- ability to adapt to changing circumstances and move funds between budget lines and/or sectors of activity, specific locations, delivery modalities, and years; to the extent possible, with no additional pre-approval processes;
- smooth and/or fast disbursement of funds;
- no-cost extensions available beyond the initial contract duration.
If published correctly, IATI data can be used for automatically tracking whether organisations are:
It is not currently possible to automatically determine whether funding meets the commitments around “flexible arrangements”. It could be possible to publish this information as an extension to the IATI Standard, depending on agreement and commitment of signatories to publish such information.
Grand Bargain signatories should publish data in several standard fields, which can then be used to independently assess whether the activity should count as multi-year funding.
Grand Bargain signatories should publish:
1,325 out of 1,521 IATI publishers currently publish the start date, and 1,106 publish the end date. 520 IATI publishers currently publish commitments, while 1,363 publish budgets, and 705 publish disbursements. Note that some publishers may not publish these elements for all of their activities.
Organisations monitoring Grand Bargain multi-year funding commitments can use IATI data to identify the share of funding that counts as multi-year funding. This section outlines a general methodology which could be used to calculate the degree of multi-year funding of each publisher’s data.
Assuming “beginning” is within the first [two] quarters (though this could easily be adjusted in the methodology below):